As monoamniotic-monochorionic twins, also known as “Mo Mo” twins, my brother and I were presumed identical. The general principle states that twins who share the amniotic sac are identical and twins who do not share it are fraternal. Over time, it was clear to our family that my brother and I were the exception to the rule. Not only do we not have the same hair and eye color, but it's also quite difficult to tell that we are related. Growing up, and still today, it was never easy to correct the common assumption that we are classified as fraternal twins. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayAccording to the general principle, we technically classify into both; we shared the amniotic sac, but we shared no physical characteristics. Perhaps this is what aroused my general curiosity. I have always loved thinking about the outcomes of unique possibilities. Being able to associate some sort of reasoning with certain outcomes took up a lot of my time growing up. And what I realized is that we can't always categorize groups without there being some overlap between them. Rather than succumbing to one (identical) or the other (fraternal), I never hesitated to explain the anomaly of being a “Mo Mo” twin. I decided to pursue a Bachelor of Arts in Interdisciplinary Social Sciences because it would allow me to explore my intellectual curiosities across multiple disciplines. My curious tendencies served me well in my undergraduate studies because they helped me think critically. During my second year, I received the highest grade in a paper revealing the capitalist motivations behind the Safe Streets Act of 1999. I argued that the legislation was used as a vehicle to benefit citizens of the upper classes by criminalizing poverty, rather than as a proclaimed instrument. intention to ensure the security of the city of Toronto. I particularly enjoyed the challenge of addressing the philosophical questions surrounding jurisprudence. The classic debate between Lon Fuller and HLA Hart cemented my desire to pursue legal education. Whether or not law and morality can be separated, the arguments presented in the debate gave me insight into the inner workings of our common law system. As HLA Hart argues, the core of certainty classifies cases in which the application of the law is clear, while the penumbra of doubt represents circumstances in which the application of the law is unclear and convoluted. In these situations, it is up to the legal profession to determine how the law should be applied in particular circumstances. I look forward to unprecedented situations and the challenge of being thrown into the darkness of doubt. My professional and volunteer experience has provided me with the tools to excel in many different environments. But more importantly, they complemented my education with one thing: perspective. I believe that studying law abroad will continue to build on this perspective by providing me with an eye-opening experience and providing me with an unparalleled legal education. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get Custom Essay As a lawyer, I aspire to practice employment law due to the shift from normative forms of employment to higher rates of precarity and volatility than before. This change has presented and will continue to present society with.