Everyone has heard of people claiming to have seen or been abducted by a UFO, how seriously they are taken and, more importantly, the skeptics take them believe. Many skeptics believe that the existence of UFOs is not real. However, individuals from different parts of the world claim to have seen a UFO and even been abducted. All of these stories share a common story, seeing bright lights, memories of an operation and then suddenly waking up to an unexplained loss of time. This is a phenomenon that has escaped scientific study. With little evidence, scientists must rely only on anecdotal evidence. Many skeptics in the scientific community argue that the study of UFO phenomena does not offer a fruitful field in which to seek major scientific discoveries, because these views are not widely accepted. Skeptics will argue other explanations such as perceptual and social errors. in our thoughts and even hallucinations can cause these unexplained observations. Most scientists argue that there are natural explanations for these phenomena. It is also a fact that while hoaxes, illusions, and misidentification of natural or man-made objects explain most UFO reports, they do not explain all of them. There are those observations that, despite the best efforts of science and the military to explain them, simply defy explanation and need to be examined more closely. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Condon's and Paynter's views on the physical evidence for the existence of UFOs are the same. Physical evidence is essential to scientific research. In scientific research, evidence is accumulated through the observation of phenomena that occur in the natural world and which is created as laboratory experiments or other controlled conditions. This type of observation is generally intended to be empirical. Similarly, Condon argues that physical evidence is more reliable than individual anecdotal evidence which may be inaccurate; this type of evidence is generally unsupported and would be more useful to the social and behavioral sciences. Paynte, like Condon, also maintains that there is no physical evidence to conclude that extraterrestrials have visited or have ever visited Earth. He claims that there are no physical objects left behind by extraterrestrials. Individuals can believe in the existence of UFOs in the same way that an individual can believe in God. In the absence of physical evidence to conclude, reliance is placed primarily on the individual's memories of the story. This form of evidence is unreliable because individuals can exaggerate and distort what they think happened. Rather, what differentiates these two arguments is Paynter's belief that without evidence, we should be skeptical of such claims, to have an open mind. Evidence can come from different sources, some will be more reliable than others and we should only look for evidence that confirms our hypotheses. There is not enough evidence to conclude that the existence of UFOs is not real. Yet Condon argues that, without any physical evidence, there must be other natural explanations for these phenomena, such as weather balloons or airplanes. He claims that the subject of UFOs has been widely misrepresented to the public by the media. Individual perceptions of the world can.