Never Let Me Go as a Marxist Novel possible threat posed by science and its discoveries. Although some elements are not as secret as others throughout the narrative, it remains a thoroughly Marxist attack on the inventions of the intelligentsia and the effect this then has on the proletariat. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The most obvious way in which "Never Let Me Go" has an underlying Marxist meaning is in the idea that the reason Hailsham's students are clones is to provide organs to the rich when they need it. The fact that this luxury is only available to the highest ranks of society is reminiscent of the way in which the intelligentsia exploits the proletariat by imposing manual labor while the rich take credit for the labor of the poor. When the rich need transplants, they can count on the Hailsham children and other clones like them to provide this service willingly, without any argument. If the discovery of cloning for transplantation purposes had never taken place, the rich would not have had this monopoly on the “proletariat” and the inequalities of opportunity that we see here would not have arisen. The rich would stay rich and there would be no clones living short lives because their only goal is to provide a new set of organs to anyone who needs them. What brings them even closer to Marxist ideologies is that children, although technically aware of their future, have been conditioned to believe that it is a normal destiny to resign themselves to, just as the proletariat believes that their life of manual labor, cheap wages and never being appreciated for the work they do is a normal thing to experience. Madame says to Kathy and Tommy later in the novel, when they go to visit her to ask for an exception: “Poor creatures. What did we do to you? With all our plans and projects? which highlights the social differences between her and them. Referring to the couple as “creatures” reduces them to animals, just as the bourgeoisie would have done if the proletariat did not deserve human treatment. The term draws attention to the fact that these are not even real humans: they are copies of a human, created for a specific purpose. More importantly, Madam saying “what did we do to you?” reminds the reader that there is a difference between them: even though they all look like normal people, Kathy and Tommy are destined to die before the age of 35 simply because their organs are going to be donated, while Madame will live his life in peace. This is entirely representative of how the rich would look down on the working class, knowing that they are being exploited for the benefit of the bourgeoisie; Madam and the Hailsham teachers always knew of the children's fate, but could do nothing to stop them from fulfilling that fate either. Without science and its discoveries, the rich would not be placed in this position of power over the clones because there would be no clones to exploit and in this way, "Never Let Me Go" attacks the very foundations of science by criticizing the possibilities it offers us. The idea of cloning that we see throughout the novel echoes scientific discoveries made at the time it was written, such as the argued "success" of Dolly the Sheep, a cloned animal who died in 2003 - which does Ishiguro in his book is to take the idea of extreme cloning which draws attention to the exploitationof human beings, and how the pain Dolly endures is only the beginning of the potential pain humans could suffer at the hands of science and the wealthy. In Georg Lukacs' book, In "Reification and Consciousness of the Proletariat", he dismantles the ways in which the bourgeoisie makes the proletariat so willing to be exploited, notably through reification, where the exploited person is so accustomed to the idea that it becomes a norm rather than something immoral. The children of Hailsham have therefore been reified into believing that the society they live in is natural while the reader can see the horror of how they live. They become objects rather than people, used to accomplish a purpose and service used only by the rich, and Miss Lucy tries to draw their attention to this by telling them "We told you so and we don't tell you." didn't say", which means they are all conscious. of their future and the tasks that will ensue, but do not fully understand what this will mean. Miss Lucy feels guilty about their exploitation and tries to explain to them that while they are "okay" with how they will be treated, they will not be okay with never living a normal life. This also highlights a gap in their objectification - they are not entirely comfortable with the situation they face and this becomes clearer throughout the novel as Ruth expresses interest in wanting to be an office worker and live a completely normal life where she goes to work every day; if reification had succeeded, she would be happy to live her simple life as a student, a caregiver, a donor. Kathy, Tommy and Ruth vaguely know their future; it's there and they know it's inevitable, but they never feel entirely comfortable with it, as shown by Ruth's reaction to not finding her parent clone. She tells Kathy, "We're made from trash... We all know that, so why don't we say it?" and attacks her, this is the first time she has openly discussed cloning and possible donation. The fact that she is so angry about this implies that her reification is incomplete because she still desires to reunite with her original clone in hopes that she can live a normal life instead of dying in middle age. The life they led in Hailsham is described as "a state of comfortable suspension in which we could reflect on our lives without the usual limitations", which indicates to the reader that there is a feeling while they are there -down from a slight worry for the future, since their childhood home is a safe space where they can imagine an unrealistic future. Other than that, they don't care at all about their future and it is thanks to the scientific discovery of clones and the cloning of people for this purpose that they live this life. The title itself, “Never Let Me Go,” is an example of subtle dramatic irony; the pronoun “me” almost mocks every character we meet, because “me” does not exist for Kathy, Tommy, and Ruth; their identity doesn't matter because they are raised for a specific purpose and their physical appearance is that of another human instead of something independent of themselves. So reducing the characters to something that isn't even an identity addresses the fact that science has led them to this place where they live and then die without ever experiencing a unique life because everything they are is copied or for the benefit of the rich. , it is the concept of the Stock Exchanges and the Gallery, which is fundamentally Marxist. Hailsham children are encouraged to create art and their lessons focus on creation rather than anything actual education, as they do not need to be educated.

Essay / Never Let Me Go as a Marxist Novel possible threat posed by science and its discoveries. Although some elements are not as secret as others throughout the narrative, it remains a thoroughly Marxist attack on the inventions of the intelligentsia and the effect this then has on the proletariat. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The most obvious way in which "Never Let Me Go" has an underlying Marxist meaning is in the idea that the reason Hailsham's students are clones is to provide organs to the rich when they need it. The fact that this luxury is only available to the highest ranks of society is reminiscent of the way in which the intelligentsia exploits the proletariat by imposing manual labor while the rich take credit for the labor of the poor. When the rich need transplants, they can count on the Hailsham children and other clones like them to provide this service willingly, without any argument. If the discovery of cloning for transplantation purposes had never taken place, the rich would not have had this monopoly on the “proletariat” and the inequalities of opportunity that we see here would not have arisen. The rich would stay rich and there would be no clones living short lives because their only goal is to provide a new set of organs to anyone who needs them. What brings them even closer to Marxist ideologies is that children, although technically aware of their future, have been conditioned to believe that it is a normal destiny to resign themselves to, just as the proletariat believes that their life of manual labor, cheap wages and never being appreciated for the work they do is a normal thing to experience. Madame says to Kathy and Tommy later in the novel, when they go to visit her to ask for an exception: “Poor creatures. What did we do to you? With all our plans and projects? which highlights the social differences between her and them. Referring to the couple as “creatures” reduces them to animals, just as the bourgeoisie would have done if the proletariat did not deserve human treatment. The term draws attention to the fact that these are not even real humans: they are copies of a human, created for a specific purpose. More importantly, Madam saying “what did we do to you?” reminds the reader that there is a difference between them: even though they all look like normal people, Kathy and Tommy are destined to die before the age of 35 simply because their organs are going to be donated, while Madame will live his life in peace. This is entirely representative of how the rich would look down on the working class, knowing that they are being exploited for the benefit of the bourgeoisie; Madam and the Hailsham teachers always knew of the children's fate, but could do nothing to stop them from fulfilling that fate either. Without science and its discoveries, the rich would not be placed in this position of power over the clones because there would be no clones to exploit and in this way, "Never Let Me Go" attacks the very foundations of science by criticizing the possibilities it offers us. The idea of cloning that we see throughout the novel echoes scientific discoveries made at the time it was written, such as the argued "success" of Dolly the Sheep, a cloned animal who died in 2003 - which does Ishiguro in his book is to take the idea of extreme cloning which draws attention to the exploitationof human beings, and how the pain Dolly endures is only the beginning of the potential pain humans could suffer at the hands of science and the wealthy. In Georg Lukacs' book, In "Reification and Consciousness of the Proletariat", he dismantles the ways in which the bourgeoisie makes the proletariat so willing to be exploited, notably through reification, where the exploited person is so accustomed to the idea that it becomes a norm rather than something immoral. The children of Hailsham have therefore been reified into believing that the society they live in is natural while the reader can see the horror of how they live. They become objects rather than people, used to accomplish a purpose and service used only by the rich, and Miss Lucy tries to draw their attention to this by telling them "We told you so and we don't tell you." didn't say", which means they are all conscious. of their future and the tasks that will ensue, but do not fully understand what this will mean. Miss Lucy feels guilty about their exploitation and tries to explain to them that while they are "okay" with how they will be treated, they will not be okay with never living a normal life. This also highlights a gap in their objectification - they are not entirely comfortable with the situation they face and this becomes clearer throughout the novel as Ruth expresses interest in wanting to be an office worker and live a completely normal life where she goes to work every day; if reification had succeeded, she would be happy to live her simple life as a student, a caregiver, a donor. Kathy, Tommy and Ruth vaguely know their future; it's there and they know it's inevitable, but they never feel entirely comfortable with it, as shown by Ruth's reaction to not finding her parent clone. She tells Kathy, "We're made from trash... We all know that, so why don't we say it?" and attacks her, this is the first time she has openly discussed cloning and possible donation. The fact that she is so angry about this implies that her reification is incomplete because she still desires to reunite with her original clone in hopes that she can live a normal life instead of dying in middle age. The life they led in Hailsham is described as "a state of comfortable suspension in which we could reflect on our lives without the usual limitations", which indicates to the reader that there is a feeling while they are there -down from a slight worry for the future, since their childhood home is a safe space where they can imagine an unrealistic future. Other than that, they don't care at all about their future and it is thanks to the scientific discovery of clones and the cloning of people for this purpose that they live this life. The title itself, “Never Let Me Go,” is an example of subtle dramatic irony; the pronoun “me” almost mocks every character we meet, because “me” does not exist for Kathy, Tommy, and Ruth; their identity doesn't matter because they are raised for a specific purpose and their physical appearance is that of another human instead of something independent of themselves. So reducing the characters to something that isn't even an identity addresses the fact that science has led them to this place where they live and then die without ever experiencing a unique life because everything they are is copied or for the benefit of the rich. , it is the concept of the Stock Exchanges and the Gallery, which is fundamentally Marxist. Hailsham children are encouraged to create art and their lessons focus on creation rather than anything actual education, as they do not need to be educated.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch