Frankenstein and scienceScience is knowledge acquired through systematic study, knowledge which then becomes facts or principles. In the systematic study; the first step is observation, the second step is hypothesis, the third step is experimentation to test the hypothesis and finally the conclusion whether the hypothesis is true or not. These steps were ingrained in every science student as a fundamental path to scientific discovery. This path does not allow one to decide whether the experience was good or bad. However, scientific experiments always have repercussions. They range from the most simplistic realizations of the difference between acid and water to the principle that the Earth is not the center of the Universe. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley depicts this difference in the story of Victor Frankenstein. A scientist who, by carrying out his experiments, creates a monster that wreaks havoc on humanity. Frankenstein focusing entirely on discovery ignores the consequences of his actions. Victor Frankenstein often considered himself a natural scientist, unlike those of his time who were alchemists. As such, he followed the same path that primary school children follow today; observation, hypothesis, experimentation and conclusion. The first step he took in creating his monster was observation. Victor Frankenstein observes... middle of paper ... the story of the DeLacys, and from his own experiences, the monster learned his evil ways. Science is not inherently bad and never will be. However, knowledge gained through science can be used to produce harm, whether intentional or unintentional, and can be dangerous. The story of Victor Frankenstein shows the possible irresponsibility in the progress of science and reinforces the caution that humanity must exercise when attempting to master its environment or itself. Today's proponents of human cloning should remember the lesson given by Victor Frankenstein before they have to deal with the products of their research and learn it the hard way...