I believe that in today's justice system we consider the person who physically harms another person to be the perpetrator, but in reality we must consider domestic violence beyond simple physical violence. It often happens that an individual controls another individual and uses psychological threats to affect a person's self-esteem and self-esteem, which could harm them mentally. Coercive control occurs when a person takes away the victim's freedom and takes away their sense of being themselves. Ignoring signs of coercion can lead to actions in which an individual attempts to harm themselves and/or those around them. The justice system must begin to view cases of domestic violence abroad as not only physical but also psychological. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an Original EssayThe role of gender has no effect on a person's violence, as women are just as likely to exhibit violence in an intimate relationship with family or loved ones. there are also cases where the roles of victim and perpetrator can change. The extent of domestic violence is not limited to the physical stage, but also the psychological stage, as an individual experiences a lot of emotional trauma in an intimate relationship, which can actually cause a reversal of the roles of the victim and the offender, as the victim has already done. has reached their breaking point and wants the pain and suffering they have endured to end. One article I looked at was "Psychoanalytic Psychology Woman Subject to Domestic Violence: The Impossibility of Separation:" This article examines how women who are in domestic violence relationships cannot simply leave the toxic relationship and eternal effects that the relationship has on the woman. We find alarming statistics on domestic violence as they relate to women, such as “In the United States, approximately one in four women will experience domestic violence in their lifetime (Metz, Calmet, & Thevenot, 2018, p. 1). A study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention at the National Institute of Justice noted the following: “Approximately 1,200 women are killed by intimate partners each year” (Metz, Calmet, & Thevenot, 2018, p. 1 Many women are unable to break free from the control their partners have over them and the violence continues. We often blame these victims by claiming that they had a choice to leave and chose to stay when in reality. simply leaving the toxic relationship does not shed light on the emotional trauma endured by these victims. Metz, Calmet and Thévenot say: “Once separated from their partners, these women envisage a new life hoping that the nightmare is behind. They become aware of the difference, the problems involved such as the partner's responsibility for the violence, their desire for recognition, the childhood problems involved, they recognize that the separation has not resolved all their problems. difficulties, memories of control and especially violence haunt them, the importance of psychological therapists is underlined here by their role in helping women to rebuild their lives. (2018, pp. 2-3). Being in such a toxic relationship goes far beyond the physical realm of the relationship. The coercive control their partners have imposed on these women leaves a long-term effect on these women that they simply cannot escape. It is often the case that people in toxic relationships linked to violencedomestic servants ask for help afterwards. This highlights the importance of allocating resources to people who have experienced domestic violence. An article I consulted that shows the criminal justice system's inaction on domestic violence issues is "Challenge the pursuit of criminalization in an era of mass incarceration: the limits of social work's response to domestic violence in the United States.” This article analyzes the criminal justice system's response to the growing concern of domestic violence and the resources it allocates not only to victims but also to the perpetrator. As domestic violence has become a huge problem across the country, two important policies have been put in place to try to combat this widespread epidemic. One of these is the mandatory arrest of at least one person when police are called to the scene where domestic violence has occurred. "In the late 1980s, mandatory arrest laws, or state legislation mandating the arrest of at least one party when police become involved in a domestic violence situation, swept the country and are now a policy in at least half of the states (Kim, 2013, p. 1280). Another policy that had a significant impact on domestic violence across the country was the “Violence Against Women Act”. “The second occurred in 1994 with the passage of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), the first federal law legislating the criminal legal response to violence against women” (Kim, 2013, p. 1280). This policy provided protection to women who had previously suffered violent abuse through domestic violence, dating violence, and sexual assault. These policies have allowed women to seek protection across the country, as domestic violence is a crime in all 50 states. As you can see, domestic violence is a huge problem nationwide and has led to the development of many professional positions in which individuals are trained to engage and treat victims and offenders in preventing such problems. Author Mimi E. Kim stated: Professional positions that have been associated with the field of domestic violence, such as crisis line worker, shelter advocate, lawyer, therapist and defender of victim witnesses, have become routine in a set of professional skills, tasks and assumed. relationships consistent with the collaborative relationship between civil society and the criminal justice system that had since been firmly established” (2013, p. 1285). These skilled employee positions are essential to protecting people who are victims of domestic violence. Without these qualified professionals, no one would be able to seek the help they need following the trauma they experienced during their toxic relationship. The statistical review of domestic violence across the United States examined the article "Nonfatal Domestic Violence, 2003-2012." This article analyzes data presented to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Criminal Victimization Survey from the years 1993-2012. Domestic violence can be classified into different categories such as cases of rape, sexual assault, robbery, and serious and simple assault, all of which can be committed by the individual's intimate partner, members of immediate family or close friends. When the police approach a situation where violence has occurred, one might think that the man is the aggressor and the woman the victim, because men are generally physically stronger than women, but inIn reality, both partners can play the role of victim and aggressor. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey from the years 1993 to 2012, "In 2003-2012, the rate of domestic violence (3.9 per 1,000) was higher than the rate of violence perpetrated by immediate family members (1.1 per 1,000) and other relatives (0.6 per 1,000) (Truman and Morgan, p. 541). What these statistics show is that people who are in intimate relationships engage in domestic violence at a higher rate than their immediate family members, and that immediate family members engage in acts of domestic violence at a higher rate than other members of their family. Intimate relationships can also be classified into three different categories: spouses, boyfriend or girlfriend, and ex-spouses. The data presented in this article show that “the rate of domestic violence perpetrated by boyfriends or girlfriends (2.1 per 1,000) was higher than violence perpetrated by spouses (1.3 per 1,000) andex- spouses (0.5 per 1,000)” (Truman and Morgan, p. 541). Women experience more domestic violence than men, as noted: “A greater percentage of women (37%) have been victims of serious domestic violence than men (10%) (Truman and Morgan, p. 543). Analyzing this article, we see that the data reported is limited. According to the Bureau of Statistics' National Criminal Victimization Survey conducted during the years 2003 to 2012, we find that there are cases where just under half of domestic violence cases go unreported. “Between 2003 and 2012, approximately 55% of domestic violence cases were reported to the police” (Truman and Morgan, p. 548). This means that police and domestic violence statistics often go unreported. What is also alarming is the fact that these people often do not seek out available supports that could help them prevent future domestic violence. “In 2003-2012, a higher percentage of victims of domestic violence (24%) received help from a victim services agency than victims of violence from members of their immediate family (18% ), other relatives (9%), acquaintances (9%). , or foreigners (9%) (Truman and Morgan, p. 550). Often, perpetrators of domestic violence indirectly attempt to regain control of their victims through the legal system. When people from previous relationships have children, the custody process is a way for the abusive relationship to continue. An article I viewed that shows how offenders attempt to maintain control over their former partners is "How Domestic Violence Abusers Use Custody Proceedings in Family Courts to Abuse Victims, and How Courts can put an end to it. “Domestic violence is defined as “a pattern of behavior in a relationship whereby the abuser attempts to control his or her victim through various tactics” (Cambell, Emmaline, p. 41). Some tactics that hitters try to use are their children. Just because the relationship ends doesn't mean the kids leave. Many abusers use their children to stay in contact with their partners. They attempt to manipulate judges by remaining calm and presenting themselves professionally so that judges will grant them custody of the children. “Many abusers may be violent at home in private, but to the outside world they appear to be caring and devoted family men. » Cambell, Emmaline, p. 43). This can be very misleading, because when these abusers show upin court, this could lead judges to award outcomes more favorable to perpetrators than to victims. When it comes to custody decisions when children are involved, judges may award custody to the parent because they were more willing to share the children with the other parent. “According to the American Bar Association, in 2008, 32 states included “friendly parent” presumptions as a factor in the child's best interests analysis” (Cambell, Emmaline, p. 46). The article defines the presumptions of “friendly parent” as the parent who is more generous in sharing the child with the other parent, who has a greater capacity to provide for that child. This is very misleading because many hitters attempt to manipulate the judges using their own power. own children to remain in contact with the victims they have abused. In the past, a police officer had to witness a crime before making an arrest without a warrant. This posed the problem that if the act was not done in front of a police officer, no arrest was made. Just because a police officer did not see the incident happening in front of them does not mean it was not a case of domestic violence. In the mid-1980s, a law removed restrictions on being present at the incident, and by 1992, 47 states and the District of Columbia allowed warrantless arrests in domestic violence cases. One article I analyzed was “Drawing the Necessary Line: An Examination of Domestic Dating Violence Laws in the United States.” This article examines how states may vary in the laws they have in place to prevent violence by who is entitled to protective orders from their partner in cases of domestic violence. Courts impose the right to grant a person a restraining order, a protective order, restraining orders, and court orders. Courts use these orders sparingly because they require the offender to leave the home even if that person owns the home, require the offender to attend counseling, limit child visitation rights, and grant the victim exclusive rights to certain personal property. like cars, whatever their title. These are used in cases where it is proven that the respondent posed a threat to a person, often to the level of reasonable doubt. “A Department of Justice study found that assaults between couples occur in shared residences 58.1% of the time. , but in situations where the victim and perpetrator reside separately only 25.3% of the time” (Greenlees, 2012, p. 679). All 50 states and the District of Columbia grant court protective orders to victims of domestic violence. Judges require that serious incidents of domestic violence have occurred before issuing a protective order because they deprive a person of their constitutional rights. For a person to have access to protection orders, they must be in or already engaged in a romantic relationship. A romantic relationship is difficult to define because it varies from state to state. Dating laws in the United States generally fall into four categories. States that offer protection but do not have a true definition of what a romantic relationship is, States that offer protection and have a definition of what a romantic relationship is, state that using a hybrid model, which incorporates a definition of dating violence through a list of factors to help the judge decide whether a dating violence is present or not; and the States.