The world's diplomatic relations with North Korea are difficult at best, non-existent at worst: the progress of their weapons of mass destruction programs is an extraordinary and worrying development. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayBut the most important regional dynamic on this issue is the interaction between South Korea, Japan, and China. China's natural default position for several years has been to point the finger at North Korea and the United States for the nuclear weapons problem on the peninsula, and to only adjust its own delicate approach slowly and gradually by response to North Korea's explosive and erratic outrages. Certainly, China's reasons are many, including fear of instability or conflict nearby, a passionate desire to ensure that there will never be a unified Korea allied with the United States, a cautious measured in transforming its nuclear-armed neighbor North Korea into an obvious country. enemy of China and fear of an influx of refugees into northeast China if the nation became a failed state. It is telling that over the past year and a half, Beijing has missed numerous opportunities to improve relations with Seoul and further isolate Pyongyang, for example by reacting impulsively to South Korea's positive idea of ​​deploying a anti-ballistic missile system supplied by the United States. (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD) and lack of respect for successive South Korean presidents. The THAAD dispute between China and South Korea appears to have been resolved in recent weeks, but the resolution included statements from South Korea that it would no longer host missiles. -defense systems. The result is that South Korean public opinion has turned decidedly against China. However, China pays particular attention to the security policies of Japan and South Korea, not wanting to see these U.S. allies strengthening their military capabilities or security alliances with the United States itself. The end goal of the United States is clear: the stated goal (while the president is not referring to the outright destruction of North Korea) is a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. From North Korea's point of view, however, this goal faces two obstacles that the Americans, who don't tend to see things from North Korea's point of view, but I don't see them. Such a desire is inherently unequal and the United States cannot be trusted. The outlook is not rosy and North Korea is unlikely to abandon its pursuit of a nuclear arsenal now. Yet national leaders have repeatedly suggested that the United States will not allow North Korea to acquire a usable nuclear arsenal. Despite all the noise, this is the first U.S. administration to threaten a preemptive strike against North Korea, giving the North Koreans pause as they could not assume their deterrent would survive. a first American strike. . If the Trump administration continues with this line of thinking, then war is likely. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay On the other hand, reversing course is not contrary to the Trump administration. It's hard to say. The alternative would be deterrence and simultaneous reassurance of allies South Korea and Japan, countries which will be more exposed to..