In the United States, many states are still undecided on whether to ban or allow euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending life to relieve pain and suffering. it is also called physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Medical aid in dying, or assisted suicide, is already legal in the states of Washington DC, California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont and Washington state. The main motivation for PAS is not pain; the dominant motivations are the loss of dignity, autonomy and the difficulty of enjoying life's activities. I think humane euthanasia should remain legal/become legal in all US states. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay A person has the right to choose whether they want to live or die. No one should be forced to live if they are unhappy and suffering. Neither the law nor medical ethics require that everything be done to keep a person alive. Insisting, against the patient's wishes, that death be postponed by all available means is contrary to law and practice. It would also be cruel and inhumane. There comes a time when continued attempts at healing are not compassionate, wise, or medically based. This is where hospice care, including home hospice care, can be of such help. This is when every effort should be made to make the remaining time comfortable for the patient. Then, all interventions should aim to relieve pain and other symptoms as well as provide emotional and spiritual support to the patient and their loved ones. The idea of ​​euthanasia goes in the same direction. If a person is fully capable and aware of the choice they are making, it is up to them whether they do it or not. Assisted dying is not an option for children, people with dementia, or anyone else who lacks the mental capacity to make medical decisions. Patients requiring assistance in dying must be able to decide for themselves about their medical care and must reaffirm their desire to obtain assistance in dying during a prolonged waiting period. For example, in many U.S. states, assisted dying laws require patients to express their wishes multiple times over a 15-day period. The assisted dying laws in these four states also require two doctors to determine that the patient is capable of making medical decisions, is acting voluntarily, and has made an informed choice regarding assisted dying. . Additionally, if either doctor discovers signs of a mental disorder, he or she should refer the patient for evaluation by a mental health specialist. As a result, we have not seen in the United States assisted dying performed on patients against their will, without their knowledge or because their families had made the choice for them. Often, the debate revolves around the right to life; Anti-euthanasia proponents argue that euthanasia infringes on a person's fundamental right to life. What they fail to see is that our “life” as human beings involves death. Without death, we have no “human life” in the very sense of its definition. Like black and white or two sides of a coin, human life cannot occur without death. Therefore, those who assert that every man has the fundamental right to live are also, unknowingly, agreeing that every man has the fundamental right to die. Euthanasia does not cause harm to others, it protects.