Table of ContentsIntroductionAlfieri in Chorus: A Greek Tragic StructureA Modern Vision of Greek Tragedy: Alfieri's Dynamic PresenceAlfieri's Ambivalence: Catalyst or Victim? Justice and Law: The Many Faces of Alfieri PerspectiveConclusionReferencesIntroductionIn the late 1940s, Arthur Miller wrote the iconic play "A View from the Bridge," drawing inspiration from the Italian immigrant community of Brooklyn's waterfront. This work, similar to a Greek tragedy, features Alfieri as chorus, offering a unique sound. perspective on Eddie's tragic descent, trapped by corrupt Italian-American society. This essay explores Alfieri's central role in Miller's play, highlighting how he serves as a bridge between the old and new worlds, shaping our understanding of the characters and the complex dynamics at play in this gritty story.Say No to Plagiarism . Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayAlfieri as Chorus: A Greek Tragic StructureMiller strategically positions Alfieri as Chorus. chorus within the framework of Aristotle's classical tragic structure. In this diagram, the protagonist, Eddie in this case, is grappling with a “tragic flaw” which precipitates their downfall. Alfieri's presence is crucial as he serves as a conduit for the audience, providing insight into the characters' inner thoughts and the unfolding narrative. This is consistent with Aristotle's assertion that the chorus should be an integral part of the play, thereby enhancing the audience's understanding of the story. Alfieri's first meeting with Eddie, characterized by his description of Eddie's "tunnel-like eyes", alludes to the protagonist's tunnel vision. obsession with Catherine and her own dignity. Through Alfieri, the audience gains a deeper understanding of Eddie's irrationality and inner turmoil. Alfieri acts as a bridge between the world of the play and the audience, allowing us to empathize with Eddie's tragic character. A Modern Take on Greek Tragedy: Alfieri's Dynamic Presence Miller's desire for a modern interpretation of Greek tragedy becomes evident as Alfieri's role transcends that of a traditional character. choir. Unlike the conventional chorus, Alfieri actively engages with other characters and becomes an integral part of the narrative. This metafictional approach, similar to John Fowles' "The French Lieutenant's Wife," allows Alfieri to communicate directly with the characters, gaining insight into their motivations and thoughts, which he then shares with the audience. This responds to Aristotle's view of the chorus as the actor in the play. Additionally, Alfieri's dynamic presence allows him to not only comment on unfolding events, but also influence them. In the first act, he tries to dissuade Eddie from taking legal action against his wife's cousins, Marco and Rodolpho, who have arrived from Italy. Alfieri recognizes the potential consequences of government involvement, both for immigrants facing deportation and for Eddie himself, who risks becoming estranged from his community. However, Eddie remains resolute, highlighting the character's tragic flaw: his stubbornness and inability to accept the changing dynamics within his house. Alfieri's direct involvement in trying to prevent the impending tragedy highlights his role as mediator between the characters and the audience. Alfieri's ambivalence: catalyst or victim? Throughout the play, Alfieri struggles with the character of Eddie, oscillating between portraying him as the instigator of his own tragic downfall and a victim of norms.