Public transport is an important and necessary aspect of modern society. It can be defined as transport accessible to the public, which charges fixed fares and uses defined routes. For example, buses, trains, trams, ferries, etc. It is essential to be successful when planning and developing a public transport system, as it can have many benefits when done correctly, such as environmental and financial sustainability, increased tourism revenue for everyone involved, increased housing value, opportunities for physical activity and an increased holistic quality of life. If poorly managed, it can have a detrimental effect on the area, such as reduced housing values, environmental effects, increased crime rates and anti-social behavior. A quality public transport system is essential in any advanced society and those who lack it will be at a serious disadvantage. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Sustainability has been identified as a key concern for public transport planning. The goal is to create a public transportation system that meets the environmental, social and economic needs of the public. The environmental impacts of public transport on the world have been widely recognized in recent years. With the transport sector relying almost entirely on fossil fuels, almost a quarter of all greenhouse gases were generated by transport in 2007 across Europe. The quality and efficiency of transportation systems must be improved due to public demand while reducing environmental pollution. Diverting preferred modes of transportation to the public system can help alleviate social and environmental problems. (Susniene 2012) Transportation infrastructure plays a vital role in sustaining the economy. The growth of tourism in the United States has prompted the government to commit to developing a national high-speed rail system. It is argued that a rapid rail system would ease accessibility restrictions and improve tourism across the country. American citizens were also positive about the idea, as this new rail system would reduce traffic congestion while minimizing fuel consumption and parking problems. For tourists, a high-speed rail system can help interweave its different tourism products and services. However, major attractions and destinations may lose significant revenue due to the accessibility of alternative opportunities. For a project like this to be successful and profitable, tourism providers must work towards a long-term goal of creating a sustainable benefit throughout the region. (Becker & George 2011) Increasing the financial viability of public transport will allow funds to be spent more efficiently, for example by advocating for the efficiency of the transport system rather than using private cars, which produce increased amounts of fossil fuels . In Germany, the share of operating expenses covered by paying customers increased from 59% in 1991 to 77% in 2007. In order to achieve financial sustainability, the public transport system must be extensively planned (Buehler & Pucher 2011 ). However, many other professionals argue that long-term planning does not produce greater financial sustainability. It is claimed that daily planning reduces and neglectslong-term environmental objectives, adopting a more focused approach on economic sustainability (Hrelja 2011). The use of public transport not only reduces greenhouse gas emissions, but also promotes physical activity among individuals. who participate. Studies show that 29% of people who walk to and from public transportation achieve the recommended daily amount of physical activity. It is argued that limiting the convenience of parking and manipulating costs such as car travel and gasoline, among others, will dissuade people from using their personal cars and increase the likelihood of using public transportation, resulting in by an increase in physical activity. Furthermore, it appears that people do not actually want a minimum commute time and further research reveals that half of employees want a commute time of 20 minutes or more, while only 3% want a commute time less than 2 minutes. Workers said they appreciated being able to complete their daily exercises while traveling rather than scheduling alternate schedules throughout the day. The opportunity to engage in physical activity on public transportation has many health benefits for society. (Merom et al. 2008) Research found that private vehicle users were willing to use public transport if this mode of transport had improved quality and efficiency. Furthermore, it is also known that car users have underestimated the quality of their experience in public transport and are positively surprised by their predisposition to improbable satisfaction. It is suggested that this is why those neglecting the public transport system do this, because their expectations of the standards are too low. This is because the majority of the public has little experience and knowledge of using public transport. This is why it is important to advocate and publicize the need to use public transport in order to achieve environmental and economic sustainability. (Pedersen et al. 2011) Successful implementation of public transport can have major impacts on tourism, which will consequently have a significant impact on the economy. The world's largest cities with the greatest levels of tourism have government agencies that actively promote public transportation. Bus, metro and train systems are essential services for tourists arriving in major cities, as private transport is considered too expensive or rare. Tourism clearly increases the demand for public transport and, due to the considerable pressure, public transport systems must be adaptable, making this an important consideration for urban planners (Albalate & Bel 2010). Although controversial, some experts say it is difficult to assess the impact of tourism as transport companies cannot distinguish commuters from tourists (Becker & George 2011). Des Rosiers et al. (2010) conducted a study between 1993 and 1997 to try to determine whether the quality of bus service in an urban area would translate into high home values. Regular routes, metrobuses and express routes were considered individually when establishing the effect on real estate prices. The results suggest that the increase in frequency of regular bus routes had a negative impact on home values. Conversely, the increase in the frequency of express routes has positive influences on housing values, in..