The triple helix model of university-industry-government interactions has attracted scholarly and policy attention in recent years. He argues that the boundaries between the previously separate spheres of industry, government, and higher education are becoming increasingly blurred and intertwined. As a result, an “entrepreneurial university” model “emerges as a hybrid organization that combines industry, university and government activities to promote innovation”. According to Rothaermel et al. (2007), the entrepreneurial university constitutes a step in the natural evolution of a university system that emphasizes economic development in addition to the more traditional mandates of education and research "with the aim of improving the regional or national economic performance as well as the financial situation of the university”. advantage and that of his faculty. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"?Get the original essay This development is said to be driven by pressures to access additional funding sources and "the active promotion of collaboration between universities and multiple triple helix partners across a range of public policies and infrastructure.” In this context, universities are placing a greater priority on being “relevant and responsive to national, regional and local needs, and these efforts have resulted in a progressive ‘institutionalization’ of third mission activities.” The increasing competition for funding as well as the political drivers of the entrepreneurial turn “could therefore be seen as coercive, normative and mimetic top-down “isomorphic” forces acting on universities”. and an “isomorphic” developmental pathway,” a number of researchers have questioned the implicit universality of the phenomenon. More specifically, the authors have highlighted the multiple tensions and contradictions likely to arise between different university missions and activities and argue that the degree and form of entrepreneurial transformation are likely to vary between countries and types of universities. For example, Philpott et al (2011), in a European academic case study, observed a “lack of unified culture regarding the relevance of the third mission, as well as obvious tensions and divisions between disciplines on meaning and purpose. type of entrepreneurial commitment. » In a study of Spanish universities, Sanchez-Barrioluengo (2014) identified “strong differences in the performance and abilities of universities to balance teaching with the new third mission. Marginson and Considine's (2000) study of Australian universities found "differences in the way universities respond to government funding reductions and the emergence of new management models, with new, less academic universities putting more emphasis on emphasis on industrial relations and applied professional training, and ancient universities maintain collegial loyalty and academic culture despite reforms. "Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay Different types of universities seem to have a mix of different triple helix activities in a variety of national and regional contexts Hewitt-Dundas (2012) found that in the UK “different types of universities exhibited different degrees and types of knowledge transfer activities” Whereas research-intensive universities. se”.