In the essay “Watching TV Makes You Smarter,” Steven Johnson argues that many shows that our society considers not beneficial on television are actually very beneficial for our mental abilities. This compelling article by Steven Johnson confronts what current literature and history teach us: television is horrible, avoid watching series. As many may know, it is common knowledge that television was designed to “dumb” and “control” us, gradually making us vulnerable to this advent of electronics. But despite this, in Johnson's mind, television today develops capabilities, thereby making us increase our intelligence. During our time of watching programs, apart from the noise, we all become able to clearly understand and determine the environment and circumstances. Johnson certainly asserts that not ALL television programs can be constructive, as there are a few entertainment figures that are too erotic in various aspects. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay assuming positions. For example, a good example of an interesting television program would be shows like History Channel or Discovery Channel, shows that we can actually learn from, either from ancient stories that are now famous, or about the animals that live in our world. Johnson illustrates a connection between multiplex broadcasts. from the series of yesteryear to the complicated programs of today, multitasking. As Johnson mentions, crowds readily support this twist because years of multitasking drama has taught them. In the past, the Hill Street show was well known for being too complicated for observers to understand. Today, The Sopranos series uses similar multitasking abilities and this series is now admired and cherished by today's watchers. This demonstrates that intelligence has also improved through complex programs that allow us to be open-minded. The author does not intend to lead the audience to believe that he specifically agrees that guardians should avoid monitoring what children watch. Rather than as he says, in other words, Johnson insists on an adjustment of values ​​to determine what actually constitutes mental harm and what is generally healthy. For example, in the article "Are Video Games Art", Nick Gillespie mentions the age of people who play video games, which ties in with one of Johnson's reasons. “The average player is 30 years old and 45% of players are women” (1). Gillespie is referring to parents supervising the type of video games their children play, which is similar to what Johnson says about not avoiding supervising what children watch on TV. “I'm not saying that parents should stop paying attention to how their children are having fun. What I am advocating is a change in the criteria we use to determine what is truly cognitive junk and what is truly nourishing (1). The example Gillespie gives involves children playing violent games, which leads to the most important reason he gives, which is that parents have lost their children to these kinds of games. (1). Children become so obsessed with violent games that they end up becoming victims of these video games, leading them to hurt themselves or, even worse, hurt someone else. Families have been torn apart because theirchildren made a simple mistake because they got the wrong idea about a video game. We've gotten to a point where families feel the need to sue the company and file a lawsuit to prove something, to let other parents know about the damage that violent video games can cause. There is a connection between these two authors because they both compare ages and both believe in observing what their children are learning, not only to check that they are on the right track, but also to ensure that they are learning something that will actually be useful in the future. Continuing Johnson's argument, he states: "...Today's reality television programs are reliably structured like a video game: a series of competitive tests, increasingly difficult over time." Many reality shows also borrow a more subtle approach from gaming culture: the rules are not fully established at the start. We learn by playing” (1). When Johnson talks about today's reality shows, he once again mentions the word video games. Describing that many series actually take ideas from video games such as difficult challenges, which really makes you think about how to achieve the goal. Although it may seem impossible at first, you'll figure it out as you continue to play, because your brain won't be able to rest in peace until you finally complete the challenge. So, who are the real beneficiaries of reality TV shows? Television offers us the opportunity to improve our own techniques by observing the behavior of participants during one of the most important days of their lives. Speaking of this type of shows, some current programs may have a similar but different complexity. Like the Lucifer series and the Deadpool movie, these two productions have a connection because they have a similar type of format. For example, both productions have a strange and interesting way of presenting their scenes, that is, they introduce a scene at the beginning of the products that makes the audience wonder why this is happening or why do we have to watch this? Which then results in confusion for the audience until later both of these productions include at the end of the story why all this confusion was necessary. But the point of these two productions is that in an educational way, Lucifer is based on the Bible, which is beneficial for religious people. In Deadpool, I think one of the important messages was that you should never judge a human being. book by its cover and that there is always a positive side to any situation. It also shows that you can't give up and that anyone can be good, and that it only takes a few seconds to be a hero. Adding more to my opinion that Johnson is right to watch certain TV shows makes us smarter. I saw someone learn and become wiser just by watching television. And in fact, I learned how to learn from television myself. For example, not too long ago, on a casual Friday evening, I was babysitting my 10-year-old niece who loves watching TV, but to be honest, she comes across as a little older than her years. My niece loves watching movies that are out of her range, I remember her asking me if I had ever watched the movie Freedom Writers which is an educational movie, but for high school kids of course I have. did but I simply said no. so I could ask him what the movie was about. As I asked her what the movie was about, she described in detail what the rising action, the climax, the falling action and the resolution were, as well.