Since the Second Amendment was made to the United States Constitution in the Bill of Rights, debate over its interpretation s is intensified. However, whatever the original meaning intended by the authors of the Bill of Rights, it is undeniable that gun violence has made American society today a threat to itself. It is important to understand the stark contrast between the social and technological context of 18th century America and that of 21st century America. The statistics show very clearly that America today faces one of the worst gun control problems in the world and certainly needs stricter regulations if these numbers are to go down. Although many still believe in the right of every citizen to bear arms, the majority of Americans still call for stricter restrictions to prevent misuse of the Second Amendment. There is no doubt that persistent, well-planned, and rigorously enforced regulation would significantly reduce gun deaths, while remaining faithful to natural and constitutional rights. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The main cause of the debate over this amendment is the manipulation of its ambiguous wording: “A well-regulated militia is necessary for the security of 'a In a free State the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. » The unfortunate truth is that it is not that ambiguous and has simply been misused and misinterpreted to suit changing political agendas. History shows that at the time this amendment was passed, the United States was under both domestic and international pressure and needed some form of security. In its struggle to extricate itself from the power of the British monarchy, America had to take into account the possibility of foreign invasion, as well as the paranoia between states that distrusted each other and the idea of big government. At the time, these fears were reasonable, and perhaps the worst fear was the idea that Americans would face a tyrannical government like the monarchical regime of their ancestral homeland. The true benevolent purpose of the Second Amendment was to protect people's rights to life and liberty from oppression, should it arise. It concerned the security of the state as a whole, not the right of any citizen to collect as many weapons as he wished. As the decades that followed revealed, the “militia” mentioned in the amendment proved to be both unregulated and unregulated. ineffective, as in the War of 1812, where America suffered heavy losses, including the sack of Washington DC and the burning of the White House. To further put the amendment into perspective, it should be noted that when the Founding Fathers envisioned the need to ensure arming citizens, the type of weaponry commonly available was not technologically advanced and was not only very expensive, but also ineffective, especially when compared to weapons technology commonly available today. 18th-century leaders could never have anticipated the weapons of mass destruction that would be legally labeled “common” in the 21st century when they spoke of the right to bear arms. Instead of gunpowder and muskets, we now have assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. This is what most people prefer.mass shooters. Despite this, the majority of firearm deaths occur within the home, either through accidental discharge, suicide or domestic disputes. The statistics are truly surprising. According to the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, in 2010, more than 31,000 firearm deaths occurred, while another 73,000 were treated for nonfatal firearm injuries. While more than 35 percent of these deaths were homicides, a staggering 62 percent were suicides, with the remainder attributed to the accidental discharge of a firearm. These numbers still do not accurately describe the danger posed by guns. Approximately 70% of all homicides and more than 50% of all suicides were caused by firearms. These studies also show that where guns are prevalent, homicide rates are much higher and the risk of suicide is quite high in homes with guns. In fact, a study of California handgun buyers found that in the first year after purchasing a handgun, suicide was the leading cause of death among these buyers. Unfortunately, more than 75% of weapons used in suicide attempts and unintentional injuries among young people aged 0 to 19 were stored in the residence of the victim, a parent or friend. The United States today has a population of more than 314 million, and it collectively owns 310 million firearms, including 114 million handguns, 110 million rifles, and 86 million shotguns. What's worse is that 8 million guns are manufactured each year worldwide, and the United States buys 4.5 million each year. Laws regarding the Second Amendment differ across the United States, but one thing remains clear. Until the District of Columbia v. Hellerin case in 2008, the interpretation of the Second Amendment was not particularly in question. Despite this, the courts ruled that civilians had the right to possess "a firearm unrelated to militia service, and to use that weapon for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense in the home." This does not mean that just anyone has the right to conceal and carry firearms (Legal Information Institute). Despite federal and state gun control laws, little has been done to address a major problem. In fact, under the Brady bill, computerized background checks must be performed on every gun sale, and yet, of the 107 million background checks Brady conducted between 1994 and 2009, only 1, 9 million attempts were blocked. Additionally, prosecutions and convictions of Brady Law violators are extremely rare. In the first 17 months of the law, only seven people were convicted. In the first year of the law, 250 cases were referred for prosecution and 217 of them were dismissed (Wikipedia reference to Office of Justice documents – currently blocked due to government shutdown) . Of course, the NRA is largely responsible for these oversights. , because he has the most to lose if restrictions are imposed on firearms. Given that this project is supported by the gun manufacturers themselves and given the influence it has, it is clear that there is an agenda of opposition to gun control. Thanks to them, loopholes in the law allow the legal purchase of firearms at gun shows without a background check. The most recent poll indicates that the majority of Republicans oppose gun control, while.