“Science without religion is lame, and religion without science is blind” is a famous quote by Albert Einstein. Over the years, people have believed that science and religion have nothing in common, that science allows us to see what is proven from day to day, and that religion is based on belief, belief in things that cannot be seen, but experienced. Society believes that this belief is only accepted on faith and spreads because someone says it is true. Over the years, science and religion have been seen as two different fields of knowledge, with different aspects, always seeming to contradict each other. However, time has passed and people are beginning to realize that the previously mentioned statement may or may not be true, that science and religion are perhaps more united than they previously thought. In fact, they can be described as different ways of looking at the world that complement each other instead of contradicting each other. Additionally, this idea is relatively new and has evolved due to the adoption and acceptance of other perspectives by individuals. The majority of society believes that to believe in something, one must understand not only the theory, but also the logic behind it. When a claim or new relative thesis is made, it must be demonstrated to others in such a way that it can be understood by others. Even if these demonstrations are scientifically proven, religion also plays a major role, as we have seen in the past (Islamic figures have been at the origin of very rapid progress in many scientific fields such as mathematics, medicine or architecture). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayAs quoted in the Quran, the Holy Bible and other holy books, faith in rationality and rationality in faith will hand in hand, which apparently tend to define the existence of this world. Rationality therefore seems to reason in an understandable way. Furthermore, any scientist, regardless of the era in which he or she lived, would not have formulated a scientific hypothesis or truth without first believing in it. Philosophically, science is defined as the knowledge of truth. Therefore, the desire to know the truth tends to be correlated with religious ideas and principles. Religion teaches one to use one's faith instead of using logic and knowledge; and science requires acquiring knowledge to understand the logic and rationality necessary to understand the world. However, this only formulates the opinions of a few scientific leaders, important figures and society as a whole, but not of society as a whole. Few scientists like Darwin have mentioned in their books and articles why science and religion are not compatible and why they tend to draw different conclusions. conclusions. They concluded that science and religion are actually incompatible, in the real world, because they reach incompatible conclusions. As Lawrence Krauss says: “Perhaps the most important contribution that an honest assessment of the incompatibility between science and religious doctrine can make is to show clearly that in human affairs – as well as in the rest of the physical world – reason is reason. best guide” tends to show the stubborn conclusions of a minority of scientists. Furthermore, they are convinced that religious communities convey absolute truthfulness of all statements recorded in the Bible and.