The Electoral College is known to be an important part of the electoral system. Many researchers have proven that this benefits our government and society in many ways. Like any good idea, it still has many flaws. The original idea originated in 1787, when the Constitutional Convention and its delegates were trying to find other ways to elect presidents. They turned to the Committee of Eleven for deferred issues, which later resulted in the creation of the Electoral College. However, many of the goals of the Electoral College do not work in today's society and therefore do not work effectively. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the Original EssayThe intent of the Electoral College was originally to prevent majority rule. Researchers believe our founding fathers had a “deep abhorrence” of democracy and majority rule. It worked for a while. The system made it easier to elect presidents. The way it worked was, basically, the candidate with the most electoral votes became president. Whoever received the second highest number of votes would become vice president. Many critics believe that one of the benefits of the Electoral College is that it gives a sense of protection to sparsely populated states by preventing highly populated states from dominating them. James Madison believed that the Electoral College would keep factions in check and maintain federalism and the rights of individual states, thus promoting the idea of ​​maintaining the Electoral College. Another advantage of the Electoral College is that, according to many scholarly beliefs, it upholds the founder's beliefs of "securing the blessings of liberty." Some might even say it levels the political playing field a bit. John Adams once said, “Remember, democracy never lasts long. Soon he gets wasted, exhausted and killed. There has never been a democracy that has not committed suicide. » This could mean that nothing is forever. There may be times when some people do not benefit from our decisions, but what matters is that it works. While it is true that the Electoral College maintains a sense of freedom, the flaws still outnumber the benefits. Many critics now believe that the Electoral College no longer works as well as it once did and should therefore be changed or even abolished. Roy T. Davis, a retired businessman and longtime Republican, once said in an article: "The fact is that it was developed 200 years ago and it has a structure that was meant to appease the opposing forces at the time so that they could agree on other issues. That being said, no matter how or why it is in place, it simply is and we should seriously consider eliminating it and moving to elections by direct popular vote. » An example of how the Electoral College does not work well is In the 2016 election, Donald Trump lost the popular vote by about 3 million people, but he still won the presidency by winning 304 electoral votes. From one perspective, this isn't fair to voters who didn't support Trump. Many critics believe that the results of the Electoral College do not represent the will of the people, thereby ignoring the political interests of individual voters, thereby proving the ineffectiveness of the Electoral College. Many people share this opinion and say that ultimately their ballots do not appear.