The agreement between the United States and Great Britain to go to war against Iraq in 2003 was and remains one of the decisions most controversial foreign policy issues of the US government. It is questionable whether, amid the attacks, the war was a justifiable move, given the fundamentally different views on the position of the global community at the time. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay on the Iraq War, also known as the Second Persian Gulf War which took place from 2003 to 2011. The Iraq War was fought in two stages. The first was a short conventional war fought in March–April 2003, during which a combination of American and British troops, with the help of other smaller contingents from several other countries, joined forces to invade Iraq and quickly defeated the Iraqi army and paramilitaries. strengths. After the invasion and defeat of the Iraqi army, major Iraqi cities suffered a wave of looting, mainly targeting government offices and other public institutions. With these serious outbreaks of violence, both ordinary criminal violence and repressive acts against the former ruling clique. What is fascinating about Iraqi political discourse is how little it has changed over the past dozen years. Even though it has caused enormous changes in our country. The underlying ethical problem of running an authoritarian and destructive outlaw state with weapons of mass destruction remains essentially the same. According to Gerard F. Powers (2019). The United States and the Middle East continue to pay the price for our political perversions in Iraq, from the big lie to abuses to sectarian violence. To give a similar example, the Second World War produced an ethic of unity and collective commitment with its common contributions to all sectors of society, the feeling that there was a "we" that transcended individualism and selfishness in the service of a higher goal. This philosophy was completely and definitively driven from public consciousness by the war in Iraq, already under pressure in the following years. Then the Iraq War seemed like the final step toward creating a “care about number one” mentality. There is broad consensus that a ruthless tyrant was neutralized by removing Saddam Hussein from power. But the debate over why the United States entered the war has become even more heated. The Bush administration still vigorously defends the argument for Saddam's death. According to its critics, the inability to find weapons of mass destruction or the links between Saddam and al-Qaeda, two key elements of the pro-war argument. Which confirms that the government may have misled citizens about the threat posed by Iraq. And the continued bombing of Iraq, along with the rapidly rising cost of the occupation, which has so far exceeded $100 billion, has led those who originally supported the invasion to rethink their decision. Universities, unions, religious groups, charities and activist groups have mobilized against the US-UK-led invasion and occupation of Iraq since September 2002, creating the strongest anti-war campaign in history. On February 15, 2003, between 6 and 11 million people gathered in at least 650 cities around the world to rally against the United States' attempt to invade Iraq. This is the largest demonstration against the conflict and.'