Arguments for and against same-sex marriage have lasted most of this century and even though we always seem to be on the verge of equality, there is always something – or rather someone – who stands in our way. That someone could be the government or the older generation who still have their heads firmly planted in their behinds. But for the sake of the article I'm analyzing, let's say this person is extremely religious. The article I chose for this essay is "'Gay Marriage' or Religious Freedom: You Can't Have Both" written by Benjamin Wiker, who - as I've said before, although that's already enough obvious just from the title, is a question of age. old marriage versus religion argument because it's not like church and state are supposed to be separate or anything. This article was published on the National Catholic Register, and based on that name alone – coupled with the title – leads me to believe that it was written by a Christian fanatic for other Christian fanatics. To me, the article almost seems like a "call to action" from the author telling his audience that his morals are under attack by the government, although I wouldn't call a bigoted homosexual hater moral. I say this because, unfortunately, many Christians – but not necessarily all – have this same mentality, especially those who I would characterize as extremists or those who only believe "parts" of the Bible and do not believe to the Bible. other parties that go against their baseless argument. Basically, they love taking a hodgepodge of Bible verses and turning it into something they can benefit from, but hate being criticized for their shit by other Christians who know they don't share the whole story. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay So, that “call to action” I mentioned earlier. I think Wiker's goal with this article was to convince his audience that the government attack is not actually happening. He wants people to believe that their morality is at stake in the hopes that maybe they will hate the marriage equality movement even more, because it's something he doesn't want, so he tries to show why other Christians won't want it either. . Personally, I think the only people who will be convinced by this argument would be narrow-minded Christians who are also stupid enough to believe that their "morals" are under attack that isn't even happening. Plus, I don't see a problem with making changes that contradict their morals and beliefs, especially if those morals and beliefs are ignorant and are used to shit on other different people. And frankly, the idea of ​​“religious freedom” is absolute bullshit. If religious freedom is just a white man's "right" to murder, attack, and ridicule people based on their race, religion, and sexuality, then perhaps we should we simply recognize that they have created an excuse to murder and oppress groups of people with impunity. who are different, because they have it in their stupid little heads that everyone is like them – or rather, they should be. As for Ethos, Pathos and Logos, I believe they are, in the same order: "they will act as an instrument of the ongoing sexual revolution against the Judeo-Christian understanding of sexuality and marriage", "If the U.S. Supreme Court Affirms Same-Sex “Marriage, Things Will Only Get Worse for Christians,” and as for.