The films "Why We Fight" and "Japan's Color War" are very different from each other due to the objectivity of films. The way these two films present themselves gives an idea of ​​what these films were trying to achieve. The film "Why We Fight" was commissioned by the Morale Department and was supposed to explain America's involvement in Asia. The aim of the film is obviously to maintain and gain support for the war effort on the American continent. The film is aimed at American citizens living in places like Atlanta, Georgia, Washington DC or Portland, Oregon. The film “Japan's Colored War” offers an analytical approach to the different causes of war in Asia. The aim of this film is to provide a more accurate depiction of the causes and effects of the war in Asia. This film is aimed at specialists in this area of ​​history. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The first contrast that must be made between these two films is the nature of their narrators. It seems that in the movie "Why We Fight", all the dialogue is done by what appears to be an American male voice. When the narrator is interrupted, it is instead an American source, such as the Chinese ambassador talking about the Japanese occupation of China. Even when the American ambassador speaks, he appears to be reading the authorized cue cards. Now this is done on purpose in order to make the United States a hero as much as possible. Even the use of a male voice is purposely done to elicit feelings of honor and duty. In the other film "Japan's Color War", different perspectives are presented, themselves spoken in a Japanese dialect. Both sides are presented, such as small pockets of rebellion against Japan's military emperor, and even outright Japanese militarist accounts. What makes this special is that there is little room for bias, since both sides are presented in equal proportions. Now this is done simply because this is how academia works, the evaluation and detective work needs to be done. Next, what needs to be highlighted is the type of footage that is shown between the two films. I couldn't help but feel like the military protests were the main focus of the movie "Why We Fight." And then, curiously, some scenes seem taken from Hollywood films, especially when they describe ancient Chinese culture. A scene depicting the Great Wall of China, the images of men on horseback in what looked like steppe bandits seemed like a very Hollywood cliché. But the excessive use of military demonstrations, marches, soldiers storming the trenches, close-ups of menacing-looking Japanese soldiers is intended to make the United States look like a hero compared to the Japanese. Even the depiction of the Chinese makes it seem like they are the responsibility of the United States. The reliance on debasement is placed on the Chinese, in that they receive no representation other than the narrator's view of themselves, and is made to appear as if they cannot help themselves from the forces Japanese. The images in the film “Japan's Color War” are extremely different from “Why We Fight”. First, images of typical Japanese life are presented, such as people working in the fields, images of Tokyo on a normal day, images of various festivals. Images attempt to summarize the entire human experience.