Determining the truth value of the premises of an argument requires that they be true, or that there is sufficient evidence for them to be assumed to be true. In the case of a cognitivist approach to determining whether something is right or wrong, the judgment process requires either the truth or sufficient evidence before something can be deemed acceptable. The relativistic method for determining right from wrong presupposes that a set of testable premises can be constructed to support their conclusion. Only after a conclusion has been formulated is a practical argument developed to create a strong argument. This implies that moral judgments are not determined through verified premises, leaving no rational argument to support a subjective perspective on morality. The relativist may then conjecture that there is no moral measure to incontrovertibly confirm the cognitivist's objective perspective, but even in specific fields, such as mathematics, certain methods of analysis require intuitive sense. An axiom is a proposition considered established, accepted, or obviously true, and can be found in many fields of study. For example, a fundamental axiom in economics is that supply equals demand. It is this same sense of intuition that is used to analyze morality in a way that allows