Many interpretations of Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter have been published, exhibited, and debated since the creation of the original novel. However, the theme of "speech and silence" is explored by Harold Bloom in his book Bloom's Modern Critical Interpretations. Bloom states that the characters in the novel view “speech as an act of power,” meaning that authority is established around conversation in the novel (1). In this extended critical writing, Bloom compares the different characters in the family to specifically explain their role in the novel's dialogue through comparison and contrast. He uses a combination of first and third person speech, and finally he uses a logical and analytical tone to explain the meaning of the motif in the story. He succeeds in making his point through effective use of points of view and an analytical tone, but his argument is weakened by his flawed character pairing. Bloom joins Dimmesdale and Chillingworth in the motif of restricted speech, known as the “secret bond” not to speak” (2). Bloom begins by explaining that each character is intrinsic to this type of communication, as each asks Hester to contain her identity in silence. This significant connection mentioned by Bloom really highlights his point about the importance of the motif, the restriction of speech, in the story, because "silence obscures the differences between husband and lover" (1). However, Bloom's major flaw in his character pairing is when he abruptly joins Hawthorne and Dimmesdale. Both hide their names to some extent. Hawthorne was declared "silent, to hide [his] name and history from the text for [his] writing", just as Dimmesdale hides his name. With the introduction of Hawthorne as a foil for Dimmesdale, the middle of paper ......wn understanding” (8). Bloom's article examines the motif of "speech and silence" in great detail. He easily displays his point of view through the successful use of his analytical tone and narrative perspectives. Its character pairing works well but is hamstrung by the lack of further character connection. To examine a motive not often discussed before the article, Bloom presents his opinion in a very clear and organized manner and connects with the audience several times, unlike most critics. In his writing, Bloom appeals to ethics on dramatic levels because of his non-radical tone and his connection with the audience during his first-person narration. Overall, Bloom's article is valid and explains his arguments well. Even if a setback in his exam is slightly detrimental to him, he recognizes many more of his flaws and works with them to actually help him write..