However, Juror 3 did not maintain control after discussions with Juror 8. For example, when Juror 8 personally attacked Juror 3, the Juror 3 lost his temper, requiring restraint. from the other jurors to the point of shouting: “Let me go!” I'm going to kill him! I'm going to kill him! (Flouri and Fitsakis, 2007, p.459). His emotional intelligence (Budjac Corvette, 2007, p. 29) was a superior negotiation tactic throughout the deliberation process. The calm and patience shown by Juror 8 caused tension among the other jurors by creating a careful and adequate creation (Flouri & Fitsakis, 2007, p. 453). ) deliberations. Juror 8's Circle of Influence (Covey, 2013) directly influenced the other jurors' Circle of Concern (Covey, 2013) by forcing them to question their thought processes. Juror 8 chose a collaborative negotiation method (Budjac Corvette, 2007, p. 63) to deliberate with the other jurors who immediately returned guilty verdicts for the defendant. Additionally, Juror 8 used his ACES to help the other jurors cross the stream (Budjac Corvette, 2007, p..