blog




  • Essay / Why HG Wells' "War of the Worlds" Should Not Be Banned

    The topic of banning books has been controversial for decades and decades, but no one ever understands the reasons why their publication is strictly prohibited. I'm part of it. Recently, I read "War of the Worlds" and researched it extensively, especially its sad story. For vague reasons, it was immediately banned in China, Vietnam and North America on the day of its official release. Could this really hurt and harm children from the inside? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Personally, I strongly believe that this book deserves to reach readers and not be banned. Some countries that banned "War of the Worlds" said the book used a lot of inappropriate language that could harm teens and cause them to do unacceptable things. For example, in the book, the protagonist usually utters the word "Shit, shit, shit" in order to show his feelings of pressure when the Martians approach his house and his attempts to escape from the place. In my opinion, these words are not as bad as the banners thought. The reason Wells used them was because they showed precisely and accurately what the character was feeling at that moment. If someone or something strong and scary tried to find me and kill me, I would be completely freaked out and would definitely shout bad words. Another reason why War of the Worlds has been banned in several major countries is that it contains countless circumstances that have been considered violent and inappropriate. For example, Ray Ferrier (the protagonist) picks up a seemingly heavy ax, suddenly jumps and cuts a Martian's body in half. It would be really unfair if the book was banned for this reason! Every action movie has its own violent scenes! The book would be tedious if Wells didn't include several bloody situations. The final reason why this book has been banned in some countries is because it is biased and linked to certain political views that many people oppose. I believe the evidence is not concrete and precise and lacks in-depth investigation and research. In the book, Wells was referring to the invasions of the British Empire when discussing the Martian attacks on Earth. It's totally based on history. The British Empire had powerful armies and artillery at the time, just like the Martians. They both seized and took control of the colonies easily, without a single drop of sweat. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, I think War of the Worlds is a great work done by HG Wells and it should not be banned. The author deliberately used offensive language, scenes of violence, and real history to make the book meaningful and practical, and he did not intend to hurt readers or oppose the government..