Financial technology, or “FinTech,” refers to the use of technology to facilitate financial services. This sector has seen an explosive proliferation of high-tech recently and technology-centric companies are seeking to disrupt the ways in which transactions are processed in areas as broad as investing and retail payments, as well as the very nature of money. However, many financial institutions and fintech companies are discouraged from innovation and entrepreneurship due to the time and cost of registering and complying with regulations. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Fintech is a broad term, encompassing cryptocurrencies, blockchain technologies, online lending, mobile banking and more. As new technologies develop, market participants, legislators and regulators are grappling with how to update a legal framework for financial matters largely erected before the advent of computers. Lobbying disclosures for the first quarter of 2019 show that a wide range of industries and advocacy groups are focused on financial technology issues, including the Association of National Advertisers, Intuit, Mastercard, Alibaba, FreedomWorks, IBM, the Entertainment Software Association and the US Public Interest Research Group. . In the United States, regulation of financial transactions occurs primarily at the federal or state level. Each of the 50 state governments, as well as the governments of the District of Columbia and various U.S. territories, have equal authority to regulate markets within their jurisdiction, and no legal authority to regulate them beyond that jurisdiction. The number of federal and state authorities that can regulate fintech products and services is significant. Some regulators include: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC): federally insured depository institutions Primary regulator of state banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve and state-chartered thrift institutions Federal Reserve: bank holding companies and certain subsidiaries (e.g., foreign subsidiaries), financial holding companies, securities holding companies, and savings and loan holding companies Lead regulator of Federal Reserve member state banks, organizations foreign banks operating in the United States, Edge Companies, and any business or payment system designated as systemically important by the FSOC Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC): domestic banks, U.S. federal branches of foreign banks, and thrifts federally chartered National Credit Union Administration (NCUA): federally chartered or federally insured credit unions Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA): Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks Review Board federal financial institutions Financial Crimes Enforcement Network SEC: securities exchanges, broker-dealers; clearing and settlement agencies; investment funds, including mutual funds; investment advisors, including hedge funds with assets exceeding $150 million; and investment companies Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): non-bank mortgage-related companies, private student lenders, payday lenders, and larger “consumer financial entities” as determined by the CFPB CommodityFutures Trading Commission. At the state level, relevant regulators typically include: state banking; consumer protection agencies; secretaries of state; and state securities commissions. A ruling by a federal judge in October 2019 impacted fintech access to traditional banking services. The New York judge ruled that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the regulator issuing the charters, did not have the authority to create a special charter for non-bank financial technology companies. The OCC first proposed this card in 2015 as a possible path for fintech companies to access the nation's financial system without having to obtain a license in all 50 states. Tech StartupIn trying to become banks, with this move we will take a slower, more traditional route to becoming banks. The “Fintech Charter” was intended to speed up the process by allowing a startup to offer lending or payment products without having to accept FDIC insurance or comply with state-to-state banking regulations. This “Fintech Charter” would have increased competition by allowing new entrants into the financial system. This decision constitutes a victory for state regulators, who wish to block fintechs and are probably supported by the big banks. Although the OCC does not have statutory authority to issue federal banking charters to nonbanks, only Congress can make such a decision, especially since the charter creates public policy implications that must be debated. in Congress. The Financial Services Innovation Act of 2016, which did not pass and was not subsequently reintroduced, would have created a system to reduce regulatory barriers to new products. While foreign regulators have found ways to promote innovation through nationally coordinated strategies that prioritize consumer protection, the United States has fragmented institutional frameworks that do not properly prioritize regulators. regulators nor meet the needs of consumers throughout the financial system. This should change in the United States. Fintech companies should actively lobby the federal government to create laws that encourage innovation and competitiveness, allowing the industry to grow and compete in domestic and global markets. Domestically, complying with multiple state laws can be an uphill battle, especially for startups and small businesses that lack the resources to achieve or maintain required compliance. It may also lead to companies structuring their businesses to change their regulatory profiles, which may or may not actually be beneficial to the company as well as the industry. Some nonbank lenders, for example, partner with banks to make loans to avoid having to register and adhere to the requirements of each state's lending law. This arrangement is artificial and has little competitive advantage beyond facilitating regulatory compliance.1 Table 1 presents some of the regulatory issues facing community banks working with fintechs and the cost of regulatory actions involving fintechs in 20172. While there are benefits for many regulators, such as competition, while regulators seek to provide better regulations, transparency and broader democratic engagement, it is the downsides that cripple the industry in..