There is a blurred line between revenge and justice. Revenge, justice? Is revenge justified? The difference may be nothing more than a mixture of the same words to feel morally sound. If we can agree on the idea that revenge is a feeling or an act of retaliation, and also that justice is nothing more than a "just" act of retaliation, then we can begin to questioning the fine structure of moral values ​​and how this affects the definition of these selected words. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay First of all, what makes an action “right”? Should the punishment be proportional to the initial act that motivated said justice, or should it be morally humane? I would say that society is built on the spread of civility and acts of humanity, so making an action "right" means that it is humane or "good". This means that justice is an act of retaliation “good” or for the better, so the line between revenge and justice is whether it is for the good or evil of the parties involved. The problem arises in the true sense of good and evil. “good and evil are only artificial constructions”. There is no right from wrong in nature, things are simply what you make them. I believe Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights shows a better distinction between revenge and justice. Rather than a simple act of retaliation, revenge is a force that causes people to behave in ways blinded by their own rage. Another distinction can be made between revenge and justice, the desired outcome. The goal of revenge is to restore or change the balance of power. Whereas, conversely, the goal of justice is more to maintain balance than to change power. Wuthering Heights beautifully shows what revenge is and uses the importance of balance in a closed system (The Earnshaws and The Lintons) to show it. To create an environment structured around balance, Emily Bronte creates a highly dichotomous view of life and all of our emotions, love and hate, revenge and justice, even The Heights and The Grange can be identified as part of the role of duplication and balance so often described. throughout this novel. The protagonist of this novel is Heathcliff and he faces many emotions of hatred and betrayal. He manages his negative emotions by channeling them into a feeling of revenge. Revenge is a common theme and the balance developed between revenge and justice is a device Brontë uses to show how revenge causes people to act blindly out of character. Heathcliff is a stranger to the Heights, and therefore he is condemned to an absent life. economic class, meaning he has no power in his society. Moreover, it is confined to the social limitations of those who do not belong to any economic class. As a child, Heathcliff was abused by Hindley. Hindley was clearly unhappy with Heathcliff's entry into the Heights and felt that he was being treated too kindly given that he was an outsider to the Heights. This is where the cyclical revenge begins and the seed is planted in Heathcliff for the desire to plan his ultimate revenge. “He reproached our father (how dare he?) for treating H. too liberally; and swears that he will bring him back to his rightful place. , it seems that Hindley demanded more attention from Mr. Earnshaw and brought out his feelings of neglect on Heathcliff. Those who have power trample.