The idea of ​​globalization raises many questions such as whether globalization has had a positive or negative effect on the media, not just in Britain but around the world and whether globalization is, in fact, an idea , an opinion or facts that have proven to be a struggle for several years, especially based on the series of works that address the theme of globalization, such as "The myth of media globalization" and "The media and globalization.” Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Globalization can be defined in many different ways, and because globalization is such a broad topic, there are so many definitions online and from various theorists. For example, three of the main definitions I discovered all focus on a different aspect and point of view of globalization. For example, the first definition states that globalization “refers to the rapidly developing process of complex interconnections among societies, cultures, institutions, and individuals around the world. It is a social process that involves a compression of time and space, reducing distances through a dramatic reduction in the time required – physically or representationally – to cross them, thereby making the world smaller and , in a certain sense, bringing them together. to each other" (Tomlinson, 1999: 165), while the second definition focuses on globalization as "the intensification of global social relations that link distant localities in such a way that local events are shaped by local events occurring miles away and vice versa” (Tomlinson, 1999: 165). Anthony Giddens, 1990: 64) which in turn suggests that “globalization refers to all processes by which the people of the world are incorporated into a single global society, the world society” (Albrow, 1990: 45). The wide variety of definitions established by many media theorists and the versatile use of the word globalization in a number of different subjects, including business studies, geography, and media-related topics, explains the extent to which globalization is a reality. considered to have changed media in Britain and had an everlasting effect; but not only does globalization have an effect on the financial situation of the country, but it also has a direct link on the effect of the industrial sector and the implication of the culture of the country. Media can be divided into three main platforms: print, broadcast and electronic media. According to Ofcom's UK News Consumption Report: 2016, released on June 29, 2017, the statistics tie in perfectly with the idea of ​​globalization changing media in the UK and this can be due to many reasons which I will describe. In terms of electronic media, “Nearly half (48%) of adults say they use the internet for news these days, an increase from 41% in 2015. + Broadcaster websites/apps are used by 23% of all adults for news, 20% use social media sites, 17% use search engines and 15% use newspaper sites/apps. In terms of print, the “overall circulation of printed newspapers has declined since 2010. National daily titles decreased from 9.2 million in 2010 to 6 million in 2016” and finally in reference to circulation “A third (33% ) of British adults reportthey consume news on the radio, and this consumption has remained stable in recent years. + BARB figures show that in 2016, adults watched an average of 110 hours of television news. 16-24 year olds watched 23 hours in 2016 compared to 33 hours in 2015. In contrast, adults aged 65 and over watched 215 hours in 2016 – a figure that has changed little since 2010. » The graph showing usage of the four major news platforms "today" and the statistics presented in the report regarding the globalization that originated in the 1400s and continues to grow (shown on the attached Globalization Timeline) suggest that globalization has, in fact, changed the media in Britain as years have passed and the use of traditional media such as television and (print) newspapers has gradually declined over the four year period from from 2013 to 2016, as predicted in the chart. While the Internet has grown steadily from 32% to 48%. This brings me to the argument that globalization is negatively changing the media in Britain. Regarding the increase in new media and technologies that has accompanied globalization and contributed significantly to it. The need for printed texts such as newspapers and magazines has become less necessary as the Internet has become more popular, and with the number of print publications decreasing, the need for journalists has diminished. In fact, with the use of global interconnectivity, communication is easier between countries, making it easier to transfer and discuss information instead of everything being done locally, which takes more time. Although this may seem to benefit the media, it is negative because it causes a decrease in the needs of the printing industry and could lead to a loss of cultural identity. This is also what the book “Power without Responsibility” suggests. Some key statements range from the idea that globalization "means we share some cultures internationally – and perhaps lose ours", "but, conversely, one of the most worrying aspects of media "globalization" is that it has led to transcontinental cultural ghettos and narrow silos of interests in which people only meet those who are like-minded" and "it is more difficult to bring people to pay attention to something other than what is familiar and comfortable to them.” This is understandable when related to the hypodermic needle theory which "suggests that mass media could influence a very large group of people directly and uniformly by 'shooting' or 'injecting' them with appropriate messages designed to trigger the desired response. On the other hand, globalization has helped and changed media around the world, and particularly in Britain, in many ways in a positive way. For example, it has been said that some influential personalities have indirectly contributed to the theme of globalization through media, which has changed the world in terms of politics, female domination and many other ways. Particularly Wael Ghonim who influenced “human rights groups, social justice movements and others…using the Facebook page as well as Twitter and other media to inform Egyptians”, Martin Luther who “ used print media to transform her world” and Oprah Winfrey who is “watched by millions of people around the world in 140 countries. Of particular interest, she became one of the most popular and admired figures – a role model and..