-
Essay / The Role of Personal Conflict in William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
The unique choices William Shakespeare makes when illustrating historical events in the play shape an individual's understanding of the event itself and perspectives divergent which encompass them. In his play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare successfully depicts the effects of personal conflicts and engages the audience through the depiction of the conspiracy against Caesar and its impact on the flawed characters, which ultimately led to the fall of Rome. The historical narrative of the play is enriched by the complex characterization, the employment of tragic structure, and the manipulation of story and characters. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay By dramatizing and manipulating the story, composers illustrate how intrapersonal conflicts lead to internalized hesitations and uncertainties, putting focusing on the impacts of the conflict to involve the public. Shakespeare first introduces the audience to Brutus' inner conflict at the beginning of the play, "That poor Brutus, with himself at war", he describes himself as "poor" and "with himself at war", revealing thus his internal conflict to the public. . Brutus's intrapersonal conflict is also evident in his monologue. Using an analogy: “It is the bright day that gives birth to the viper; …Crown him? … I grant it, we have put a prod in him, so that he can, as he pleases, endanger.” Caesar's comparison to a poisonous snake depicts him as a person who will no longer have compassion for the people of ancient Rome if he gains too much authority. Shakespeare skillfully influences Brutus to have conflicting opinions about Julius Caesar. Throughout the play, Shakespeare describes Caesar as "Caesar turned to hear", the use of the third person emphasizes his exaggerated view of himself and represents how ambitious he has become, which brings Brutus to question Caesar's leadership, involving us in their personal development. conflict. Additionally, Brutus' cognitive dissonance is increased in Caesar's death scene. Shakspeare emphasizes a feeling of closeness and intimacy between Brutus and Caesar, changing the story so that Caesar speaks his final words: “Et tu, Brute? Then Caesar falls. to Brutus. Shakespeare appeals to the audience's sense of pathos by having his last words spoken in Latin. We, alongside Brutus, are engaged in a sympathetic relationship with Caesar, but also alienated and forced to question Caesar as he still clings to his selfish self by referring to himself in the third person: "So Caesar's Tomb. Therefore, through the characterization of Brutus as an uninformed idealist, doubting the true danger Caesar poses to Rome, Shakespeare skillfully investigates intrapersonal conflict while engaging the audience. Through the manipulation of historical events, Shakespeare effectively explores the consequences of interpersonal conflict. among the characters while successfully engaging an audience. Shakespeare highlights the impacts of interpersonal conflict during the funeral oration by portraying Brutus and Antony with manipulative traits that allow them to dissuade the plebeians from forming their own perceptions. Caesar's “ambitious” nature is the public illusion Brutus creates for the crowd: “But because he was ambitious, I killed him. …death for his ambition. Through the repetition of "ambition", he shows how the conspirators believe that Caesar was on the verge of becoming a tyrant, which is contrary to Roman values. For.