In developing countries, people are continually exploited of their rights with the use of leisure products and events with capitalism. It is essential to recognize the positive and negative gains from the exploitation of people in developing countries. This is evident in the 1988 Seoul Olympics, Nike sweatshops, and general purchased items. Mega-events are large-scale and are usually organized in host cities to attract tourists and media. An example of a mega-event is the 1988 Seoul Olympics, which was heavily criticized for exploiting the city's residents. This leisure event had a negative impact on the slum dwellers, eliminated from hotels and modern homes by the government with technological and scientific changes. This drastic move replaced 136,000 housing units in order to improve the appearance through beautification of the host city in a short period of time, especially with the market pressures of Western civilization compared to the market developments of Seoul due to poor housing development. The capitalist government ignored the idea of ​​future solutions to the problems of slums, which forced people to live in illegal housing by exploiting the legal system to gain recognition in the contemporary world. This also resulted in "carrying long-term debt and always requiring long-term usage programming" (Roche, 1994), thus further exploiting human ethics by giving 720,000 people no option to leave or stay. Notably, the Seoul Olympics were a major leisure mega-event, as only 10% of low-income homeowners can afford the new housing infrastructure, leaving the remaining 90% to live in illegal housing. The government abused its privileges to own a renovated house...... in the middle of paper countries. These leisure products are used daily by middle and high income earners. It is common that these people do not like exploitation, but they are still reluctant to change this problem because they buy the product for the brand. The gains observed for developed countries concern the reduction of landfills and pollution, but we neglect the destination of this waste. This particular problem does not affect buyers since we pay a large amount of money for leisure items. These leisure items exploit buyers because the cost of the products is not valued predominantly in the price but for the children and middle-aged women who suffer by making these products without unions in slums. Superior societies recognize the value of the product to the brand by justifying the reification of items.