What happens after death is a widely debated and relatively unknown topic that has been discussed many times in philosophy. Different theories have been proposed about what might happen to the body and soul after the person dies. It also raises the question of how everyone should live their lives based on what might happen after they die. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay According to Socrates, two things could happen after death. The first being “annihilation” or simply a very long sleep where the person is not conscious of anything. He says that would be a good thing because there would be no consciousness and death would be like a continued example of the best night's sleep you've ever had. The other scenario would be that after you die, the soul leaves and migrates to another place. Socrates states that this is also positive because he says that if when we die our soul leaves our body, it must go somewhere with all the other dead people. This way, you can meet other wise and important people in the “afterlife”. Socrates says the best option would be the second, where you migrate to another place. He says this one is more favorable because if everyone who died ended up in the same place or in endless sleep, it would be pretty thankless. On the other hand, for Socrates, the best place after death would be if, when you died, you were taken to another place where you could meet all the wise men and heroes of the past. He said it would be a great personal experience in which you could examine everyone's mind and discover who is truly wise, which would be far more fulfilling than eternal nothingness. In Phaedo, Socrates presents reincarnation through a series of metaphors. he compares sleeping and being awake in that if you are not asleep you must be awake and if you are not awake you must be asleep. This is also comparable to living and dying; if you are not living, you must be dead and vice versa. He uses these opposites to say that there is a sort of cyclical theme between the living, the dead, and reincarnation. This cyclical process includes life and then the opposite of what would be death. He then argues that there is a rebirth or birth of the dead into the world of the living, which in turn creates the cyclical nature of the reincarnation he proposes. The body is described as a prison in which the soul is locked and must be freed. The body is something that wants material and unsatisfying things, these material things and desires can “burden down” the soul. Therefore, if a soul is unable to move on to the next realm and reincarnate, it must have been "polluted" or weighed down by the joys or material things of this world. This means that the person's focus on physical or bodily things has been so heavy that the soul could not be released and in turn could possibly reincarnate into a lowly thing like an animal or something. something that is stuck like something hovering above. cemeteries. However, if a person lives his life without the material or bodily joys of life and focuses on more fulfilling things to nourish the soul, he will eventually go to a new realm when he dies and will not be reincarnated. When Socrates says that doing philosophy on the right is “learning to die”. I think he means that to study philosophy and do it well, you have to learn three things. These three things being; the soul, the body and the afterlife. Learning these three things will teach you how it all could beinterconnected and influence each other after your death. Based on this, I'm not sure which death narrative fits best. I think I could possibly be one of them. However, if I had to choose, I would think that the death narrative would best suit Socrates. The opinion would be that when you die, you go somewhere else. I think this view fits best because it also highlights the theme of possible reincarnation, as discussed above; which means I think his take on studying philosophy and learning about death will inevitably teach you about the body and soul and what might happen to them after we die. This means that if someone discovers the relationship between these things, they will eventually want to try to "free" their soul when they die so that it can move on to a possible afterlife and not be stuck in this world because she was weighed down by material things. I think that because of the possible relationships between everything, such as the body and soul, and this world and the afterlife, people will want to try to live the best life possible. However, this may differ depending on which account of death you believe. For example, someone who believes in the first narrative of death, that when you die, you simply sleep endlessly. This person may not really care about living their best life without material or unimportant things. Such a person would probably say that when you die, if it is just an endless sleep where there is nothing and no consciousness, all the work you have put in has been for nothing. This means that if your life is lived "by the book" so to speak and free from the fun but perhaps unsatisfying things of the world, but ultimately death is just nothing, you have wasted your life. By waste, I think they would mean that you have gone to great lengths to try to avoid the pleasant things in life for something perhaps even more unsatisfying in death. Therefore, someone with such a view will likely live a life full of material things that could make them happy in this life. On the other hand, if you have someone who believes that when you die, something happens to you and you go to another place. , they might try to lead a cautious life. This means that such a person will probably know the difference between body and soul and will probably believe such things about himself. They would probably try to avoid material things unlike the other person. They would probably also try to make sure that they live a life the best they can to try to help others make sure that their soul remains pure. This difference in mentality towards death radically changes the way everyone lives their life. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay I believe that we can apply the teachings of philosophy try to live our lives as best we can and that there can be a happy medium between the two spectrums. By this I mean that to lead a fulfilling life, I don't think we should focus too much on material things, however, a few unsatisfying things that might make you temporarily happy in this life cannot harm you. I don't think that by sticking to a very strict way of thinking, if you do something wrong it will impact your reincarnation "status". I do however think that we should try to live our lives in a positive way and try not to harm others, but rather help everyone as much as possible while, 20(3), 463-468.