As American citizens, do we have the right to bear arms? America's growing gun culture stems in part from its colonial history, its revolutionary roots, and the Second Amendment, which states: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, must not be violated. This amendment has come under scrutiny over the past decade due to mass murders involving a gun. This is a hotly debated topic with two very polarizing viewpoints. On one hand, it is believed that more gun control laws would lead to a decrease in gun violence. On the other hand, it is believed that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens is not the solution to controlling gun crime. This can be seen as a debate between protecting individual rights and meeting the needs and interests of the community as a whole. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Taking guns away from law-abiding citizens not only leaves many people unprotected, but it also won't have the dramatic effect of controlling gun violence that everyone hoped. It's easy to conclude that fewer guns in public possession would lead to less gun violence, but is that true? The fact is, criminals will find a way to get a gun if they want to. If a criminal was already planning to harm someone with a gun, it would not matter to him whether the gun was obtained legally or not. The problem with this issue is that many focus only on reducing gun violence and murders. The overall murder rate is also an important statistic because you have to think about all the cases in which American citizens used guns to protect themselves. America has about 1.45 guns per American, or about 393,347,000, which is the highest total per capita in the world. In 1993, there was less than one gun per American. What may be surprising is that the murder rate has declined as gun ownership has increased. The idea that more gun ownership equals more crime, or even more guns equals more mass shootings has very little support. When people watch the news and see a mass murder involving a gun, it can spark anger. One might ask, “How can we continue to let things like this happen?” ". Many people automatically think that with all this violence, we need stricter gun control laws. The reason they think this way is because current gun control laws are not as effective as hoped. The main thing to understand is that you can put a law into legislation to strengthen gun control, but criminals don't care. They are criminals, if they want a gun they will get it illegally. It doesn't matter whether the gun is legal or not if a criminal uses it against someone else. The act of them choosing to use a gun on someone is illegal anyway, so why would they care about a gun control law? “Every mass shooting that has occurred has been carried out in violation of existing laws, which have done nothing to stop it. It is not because the laws are not enoughstrict, but rather because we cannot legislate on behavior.” Basically, criminal activity, including firearms, cannot be stopped by gun control legislation, because "you can't legislate behavior," as Ryan Cleckner explains. Here's another statistic that shows how ineffective current gun control laws are. Gun control in Texas has an “F” rating from the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Yet Texas has seen only 6.6 percent of total public mass shootings since 2000, which is lower than expected given that it is home to 8.6 percent of the national population. On the other hand, Washington State has a "B" grade and represents 2.2 percent of the national population. population, but 8 percent of mass public shootings since 2000. This is just another example of how gun control has failed to do its job and some lawmakers believe that control increased gun ownership is the answer which is absurd. I understand that when people fight the gun control argument, they are looking for ways to combat the number of gun-related murders and violence across America. However, what defense does a law-abiding citizen have against a criminal possessing an illegally obtained weapon? Enacting strict gun control will only create more defenseless victims in the face of an armed attacker. Would you be surprised if I told you that “gun-free zones” are the most popular places for mass shootings. Probably not. What happens when all guns are banned and the only ones left are illegal guns in the hands of criminals? How can we defend ourselves. Adams (1996) identifies two theoretical explanations for defensive gun ownership: acute fear of crime and past experiences of victimization. This is the reason why many like to have a gun at home for protection. They choose guns as a means of self-defense for the same reason the Secret Service uses them to protect the president: guns keep bad people from hurting good people. People think of guns and automatically think of murder. But the truth is that guns save lives and without them many more would be lost. “Guns prevent approximately 2.5 million crimes per year, or 6,849 every day. Most often, no shooting is ever done and no blood (including that of the criminal) is shed.” and “Each year, 400,000 potentially fatal violent crimes are prevented by firearms. » According to the Department of Justice's own statistics, 67,740 people each year do not become victims because they own a gun. It is plausible to suspect that if more states allowed concealed carry, the number of cases of defensive gun use would be even higher. The number of defensive weapons in use doesn't matter much to anti-gun advocates. Whether it's 67,000 or 2.5 million or anywhere in between, they will do everything they can to dismiss the defensive use of weapons as insignificant. They want to focus only on the dead lying in the street rather than those using a gun to stay standing. By trying to limit the number of guns in the hands of criminals, you deprive them of law-abiding citizens who help the world immensely. The idea that gun violence is the only problem is absurd, when violence in general is the problem. “Anti-shooters often point to countries where guns are..