blog




  • Essay / Criminology: Paradox of Successful Failure

    Theories of state crime and moral panic view exceptionalism as essentially lawbreaking and therefore complicate the relationship between crime and social order by focusing attention on the redistribution of power between authorities. It tends to argue that, as security comes to challenge the control of wrongdoing as a critical object of criminological inquiry, greater changes in patterns of action in favor of public security and in The consideration of psychological warfare acquires another importance for criminology. Schmitt argues that War on Terror theory and the dialogue between criminology and international relations focus on state theory which undermines the creation of moral panics created by state elites to advance their interests and power . Thus, the work of criminology moves away from the interests of crime and favors gaining the upper hand in the politics of authority, with criminologists focusing on criminal wrongs rather than the pre-existing system of legal rights. The war on terror discourse has accepted the production and escalation of violence and terrorism while attention is diverted from the root causes of political violence and focused on strengthening government control. Therefore, to suggest that modern political communities need a moment of violence or injustice to function, contradicting the goal of criminology to control the growing issue of crimes of all kinds, especially state crime, and ultimately helping to characterize Loader and Spark's "criminology paradox" argument. successful failure. “Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Subsequently, the war on drugs is another illustration of the widespread violation of human rights in the context of the civil war and reinforces the notion of the paradox of successful failure as the growing importance military and government aid support economic underdevelopment. The issue of the War on Drugs reinforces previous arguments in this essay as it is a key driver of mass incarceration, punitive developments, and risk management. Harsh drug laws are crucial to excluding and containing the inner-city poor rather than creating a rational drug policy and have encouraged marginalized sections of the world to trade in the illicit drug market because of the opportunities limited in the global economy. In particular, “Plan Columbia” supported the growth of the War on Drugs by providing $7.5 billion in aid to support the U.S. government's economic underdevelopment and combat excessive drug trafficking. Aerial fumigation has been used to support coca cultivation, leading to crop eradication, disadvantaging the livelihoods of rural farmers as they do not benefit from the drugs produced, even if they become increasingly and more precious. These issues constitute a major problem in green criminology, as the environment is destroyed for economic gain. However, these crises are rarely discussed and are often ignored unless they involve society on a larger scale, such as the involvement of drugs in street crime. Subsequently, the intensification and expansion of the fight against drugs has a direct effect on deliberate political decisions and on the deciphering of.