Table of contentsIntroductionSummaryAnalysisConclusionIntroductionIn the great complexity of therapeutic human sciences and health, there are various reflections that certify few disciplines that strengthen students' understanding. One of them is “Science, Technology and Human Health: The Value of STS in Medical and Health Humanities Pedagogy” written by Julia Knopes. four details involve. The article is enlightening and informative since the author proposes that STS can extend the foundational understanding of undergraduate and graduate students in ways that STS offers substance and influences encounters with disorder and good -be. Say no to plagiarism. -essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayAbstractAs the article shows, STS is exceptionally cost-effective to consider the development of specific disciplinary viewpoints for students who follow the program of therapeutic and health human sciences. Additionally, Julia Knopes' article explained the program's affiliation with science and technology studies approaches. The main emphasis is that STS is considered invaluable for health humanities, including the debate on the effective procedure in the advancement of medicine, the evaluation of the significance of innovation, how it directs students to diseases and how it is influenced by societal beliefs, the measure of assortment. biomedical epistemologies, instead of expecting biomedicine to be organized information that does not change context, and which criticizes the predisposition to biomedical training, especially in the degrading voices of women. The theoretical value of the primary objectives and association of STS with the curriculum was evaluated at Case Western Reserve University. Additionally, by noticing how the program can be adapted at other colleges, it can explore how STS can be integrated into the program. Therefore, from the arguments, Julia Knopes concluded that enrolling in medical humanities and science and technology studies together could provide essential ways to be vigilant, dexterous, and beneficiary of biomedical care. AnalysisIn the article, Julia Knopes well organizes the discrete elements of the arguments as the supporting points of interest have been expressed, first from history to the use of advances in science. Regarding the previously mentioned main advantage of STS in the field of humanities of therapy and wellness, the author stated that STS challenges the idea of ​​an orderly process in the development of science. According to the article, “Medical anthropologists with STS are critical of scientific advancements in which not all advancements are positive.” This infers that through STS, progress is being made in students' ability to comprehensively supervise the orderly progression of science. Furthermore, the author also stated that biomedical healing has uprooted innate healers. This suggests that by examining societal events, students can seek more in-depth research into how science develops and influences biomedicine today. In the second argument, STS work argues that advances design, shape, and affect how we characterize and respond to illness. and in return, recover unused implications given the beliefs, practices and values ​​that encompass their..