Table of Contents12 Angry Men: Stages of Team DevelopmentTrainingStormingNormingPerformingAjourning12 Angry Men: Stages of Team DevelopmentTeam Development is a crucial aspect of any group and consists of six stages: stage one – formation, stage two – storming, stage three – normalization, stage four – execution and stage five – adjournment (or distortion). In the film 12 Angry Men, the 12 members of the jury take these steps at different points during the deliberation; This article will serve to explore how and when the jury went through the stages of team development. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayTrainingThe film begins with our group already trained, as they have been selected to be part of the jury; They actually begin the team development process at the start of deliberation, when the jury members all sit down and define what their goals and obligations are, saying that if the defendant is found guilty, they must send him to the electric chair. The training phase continues as jury members begin to assume their respective roles; the members discover that Juror 3 and Juror 10 are alpha males, Juror 8 takes his civic duty seriously, but has biased opinions (he's just a young guy, how did he could have committed such a crime?), and general introductions of members of the group.AssaultThe assault stage follows the training stage and begins after the jury's first round of guilty/not guilty voting; the storming scene is triggered by Juror 8's not guilty vote, which is the first and only difference between the group at the time. The storming stage is fostered by the jury member's perception of civic duty, and ignited to another level when Juror 8 attempts to make his point, while some of his fellow jury members play play games and make blunders. In the storming phase, the alpha males of the group attempt to insert and reinforce their brand of "leadership" through verbal force and intimidation, such as Juror 3 cutting off the other jurors during the initial deliberation, telling the group that they are going to skip the stage. set lyrics rotation. This power struggle, Juror 3's intimidation technique versus Juror 8's logical argument technique, continues throughout the story. Normalization The normalization stage begins when Juror 8 begins to present his case for a not guilty verdict, while persuading others to his side; it is also the stage that lasts the longest throughout the deliberation and occurs in unrelated stages. Once there are a few jurors on the not guilty side of the verdict, open discussion becomes much more free and direct; the jury members begin to have a real debate about the facts of the case and whether they could be debated. The discussion, and the normalization stage, really begins when Juror 8 hits the same knife on the table; before that, the discussion was rather closed, with most of the other jury members saying there was no chance the child was not guilty. not guilty. Juror by juror realizes that he may have come so close to sending a potentially innocent person to prison and furthermore feels obligated to explore the facts in order to return a fair verdict. Jury members pool their individual experiences and knowledge to help each other reach a not guilty verdict, like Juror 8 trying to recreate the witness who had to walk to his.