Favorite selection Sundahl, Debi (1998) "Stripper". On Sex Work: Writings by Women in the Industry In "Stripper," Debi Sundahl explains her knowledge and experiences of sex life while working as a sex object and as a feminist and liberator. Sundhal agrees with the idea that sex workers are responsible for the sexual repression of women, arguing that in truth, for any free-thinking onlooker, the very existence of a sex worker "offers a distinction and a choice as to when a woman should be treated. as a sexual object and when she should not be". In this article, Sundahl intends to invent a vice-like hold in the sex trade for women, as a result of this; Sundhal launched in 1984 the first women-only striptease event at a lesbian hostel in San Francisco, Sundhal argues that the fact that women are not vigorously lured into the sex trade, into the role of owners, bosses and clients, highlights the gendered view of the social order of opinion that the reality that women have hardly had an erotic atmosphere that is solely their own creation and for women, this experience is "inherently." linked to the sexist attitude that a woman's role in society is to be a housewife/mother/sexual servant. Sundhal is a successful stripper, as well as an entrepreneur and advocate for freedom of physical expression. Sundahl cross-examines dominant gender roles; Accordingly, it is evident that a system aims to undermine these roles, as her article provides significant information about a feminist or social scientist who attempted to have as her subject a structural investigation into the development of strippers . This article therefore constitutes the middle of the paper agreement. But this could not be achieved if women are not considered free individuals. In both marriage and prostitution, Peteman argues, women must enter and remain as free individuals, but political and personal interests do not. Consequently, in all kinds of contracts, institutionalized or not, women remain contractually subordinate to men. My point of view, I don't like this article because it argues that in the profession of prostitution, women are not part of a free individual in the same way they are in marriage. The similarity described by the author is so great that there is no distinction between the morality and immorality of marriage and prostitution. In addition, I did not like this article for its vagueness in expression and the changing structure of the paragraphs which is all the more confusing and very philosophical..